Log in

No account? Create an account
log f-list backlog .nfo weev.net back back forward forward
Response to NYT article, part 1 - Andrew Auernheimer — LiveJournal
Oðinnsson. Market abuser. Internationally notorious computer criminal.
Response to NYT article, part 1
171 comments / leave comment
From: (Anonymous) Date: August 4th, 2008 07:05 am (UTC) (link)

ID and Evolution different Epistemic Orientations

"Intelligent Design" is a non-falsifiable hypothesis and that is the ONLY way to meaningfully assert that it isn't mutually exclusive from Evolution. IOW, you could always retort any empirical finding made by the evolutionist, "it was designed to evolve the way it did." This is essentially the Catholic version of evolution. Nonetheless, ID is still not a scientific hypothesis.
171 comments / leave comment